Skip to content
Tony Wood
Home

Why Boasting 'No AI' on LinkedIn Could Cost You £10K in Lost Productivity This Year

Tony Wood |

Recent data shows AI-generated content floods LinkedIn, yet boasting "no AI" signals effort over outcomes—missing out on efficiency gains that add real value.

Key Takeaway: Leaders who blend AI with human insight can slash content creation time by 70% and lift engagement without losing authenticity.

Strategic Imperative

  • Market Context: Over 54% of longer LinkedIn posts are now AI-generated, per 2025 studies.
  • Competitive Lens: Firms using AI for content see 85% better performance than those avoiding it.
  • Vision Statement: By 2026, 75% of professional content workflows will integrate agentic systems for smarter productivity.

“Failing to adopt AI-augmented content strategies could erode team efficiency and market edge by 2026.”

Lately, I have noticed a trend on LinkedIn: posts proudly declaring, "I didn't use AI for this." It feels like a badge of honour. But as someone who uses AI to enhance my content—fact-checking, grammar tweaks, structuring ideas—I wonder why. If the output helps you, does the source matter? Or are we stuck on purity over productivity?

This stems from my own experiments with agentic systems. These are AI networks that act like teams for tasks such as content creation. Unlike enterprise governance, this focuses on personal leadership. You choose an agentic culture for daily workflows. It is bottom-up, with insights on why we resist AI—often due to status, not quality.

With the 2025 AI Action Summit emphasising ethical collaboration, now is the time to reframe. View agentic culture as a custom playlist for AI helpers. Prioritise usefulness over ego. The right culture turns resistance into gains.

Most view AI as a threat to authenticity. They boast "no AI" to show skill. But what if we chose a culture that celebrates outcomes? Use AI to augment ideas. It is a hack—reframe effort as smart work.

Here is the thing: others think this way too. "Lately, LinkedIn posts have been massively AI-generated. On one hand, I can understand it because it allows people to produce a higher frequency of content, even though the actual content can be quite questionable. On the other hand, I would like to hear the opinion of the person, rather than something written by an AI." This highlights the tension between speed and voice.

Another perspective: "The efficiency gains in content production are hard to ignore. An AI can generate a 1,000-word article in a few minutes, whereas a skilled human might spend 4–8 hours on the same task. This means a single content strategist armed with AI assistance can draft multiple articles per day. For agencies and in-house SEO teams under tight deadlines, this speed opens up exciting possibilities. You can jump on trending topics immediately or produce content at scale for a large site without waiting days or weeks for writers to deliver. In industries where being first matters, AI’s quick turnaround is a competitive edge."

And one more: "If you’re a creative wondering how you should be building generative AI into your own day-to-day work, the first rule is to remember that it's there to augment your capabilities rather than replace them. As Writesonic CEO and founder Sam Garg explains, generative content by itself is often very generic, formulaic, and not primed to do the one thing digital content usually has to do, which is to grab our attention. This means that while generative AI tools are perfectly capable of, for example, writing an article like this one, a script for an ad, or generating an entire promotional video, this isn’t usually the best way to use it."

Drawing from my guidelines, I have built a base culture for agentics in content. It blends openness, experimentation, and ethics. Are we celebrating unproductive work? If AI improves it faster, why resist?

The Fleshed-Out Cultural Framework

  • Openness & Dialogue: Encourage voices. Value candour. Treat dissent as a contribution. Twist: Integrate human input openly. Explain AI changes transparently.
  • Practical Experimentation: Build small, learn fast. Mistakes are signals. Twist: Test variations quickly. Measure engagement.
  • Community & Collaboration: Work collectively. Credit explicitly. Twist: Attribute AI openly. Highlight human core.
  • Responsibility & Ethics: Be transparent on limits. Focus on fairness. Twist: Evaluate on usefulness. Disclose AI use.
  • Human + AI Synergy: AI augments. People central. Twist: Augment ideas with efficiency. Highlight trade-offs.
  • Curiosity & Critical Thinking: Ask why and what if. Twist: Question assumptions. Adapt from feedback.

This base evolves agentics like juniors.

Potential Challenges

  • Resistance: Fear of lost skills. Hack: Frame AI as freeing time.
  • Over-Reliance: Generic outputs. Solution: Iterate with guidelines.
  • Ethical Slips: Trust erosion. Guardrail: Mandate logs.
  • Scalability: Stifle variety. Fix: Allow experiments.

Anticipate to strengthen.

Call to Action: Start a 2-hour sprint today: Define your content issue, reframe with AI culture, prototype a rule, test this week. What could you gain in the next 24 hours?

Links:

Quotes:

  • Human vs. AI-Generated Content: Why Authenticity Wins Every Time (LinkedIn, 2025) by Björn Otto: "Lately, LinkedIn posts have been massively AI-generated. On one hand, I can understand it because it allows people to produce a higher frequency of content, even though the actual content can be quite questionable. On the other hand, I would like to hear the opinion of the person, rather than something written by an AI.", Trust rating: Medium, Reason: Personal opinion on LinkedIn, relevant but subjective, date written: 2025
  • AI Writing vs Traditional Writing: Pros and Cons (aicontentfy.com, 2025) by AIContentfy team: "The efficiency gains in content production are hard to ignore. An AI can generate a 1,000-word article in a few minutes, whereas a skilled human might spend 4–8 hours on the same task. This means a single content strategist armed with AI assistance can draft multiple articles per day. For agencies and in-house SEO teams under tight deadlines, this speed opens up exciting possibilities. You can jump on trending topics immediately or produce content at scale for a large site without waiting days or weeks for writers to deliver. In industries where being first matters, AI’s quick turnaround is a competitive edge.", Trust rating: Medium, Reason: From an AI content site, informative but potentially biased toward AI benefits, date written: 2025
  • Generative AI And The Future Of Content Creation (LinkedIn, 2023 updated 2025) by Bernard Marr: "If you’re a creative wondering how you should be building generative AI into your own day-to-day work, the first rule is to remember that it's there to augment your capabilities rather than replace them. As Writesonic CEO and founder Sam Garg explains, generative content by itself is often very generic, formulaic, and not primed to do the one thing digital content usually has to do, which is to grab our attention. This means that while generative AI tools are perfectly capable of, for example, writing an article like this one, a script for an ad, or generating an entire promotional video, this isn’t usually the best way to use it.", Trust rating: High, Reason: Expert analysis with practical advice, updated for relevance, date written: 2025 Update

Share this post

Keep reading