The United States federal government has struck a deal to provide every executive branch agency with ChatGPT Enterprise one dollar per agency, for a whole year. That’s not a typo. It’s "government leading by example using the best in AI to improve delivery for every American." (OpenAI, Trust: High – official OpenAI announcement, Aug 2025).
Let’s pause to let that land. This is the world’s largest government rolling out AI tools on a scale and at a price so symbolic that the focus is clearly not on saving a few pennies, but on setting a standard for operational excellence. Officials, NHS counterparts, council leaders what if this was your “new normal”?
Put simply, “OpenAI on Tuesday announced it will offer its ChatGPT Enterprise product to U.S. federal agencies for $1 through the next year.” (CNBC, Trust: High – major business news outlet, up-to-date reporting, Aug 2025). This is more than a tech experiment it's rapid, at-scale rollout of AI to every corner of government, designed to make public services more responsive, efficient, and transparent.
Why does this matter? Because a move with this scope sends a clear message: from risk management to productivity, from paperwork reduction to smarter oversight, leading governments are no longer waiting for permission to innovate. They’re making AI part of every employee’s toolkit, not an expert sideline.
That got me thinking, honestly a bit enviously: where is the UK’s big bet, our own “one pound for the future”? Our AI startups punch above their weight. We host global summits and draft strong AI ethical frameworks. And yet, we’re not yet seeing whole-of-government adoption on this scale.
You can see it in the official playbooks: “The UK Government has established an AI governance framework addressing transparency, accountability, and ethical risks associated with public sector adoption of artificial intelligence.” (UK AI Opportunities Action Plan, Trust: High – UK government policy, July 2025). These are sound, thoughtful policies but they echo what many in tech call a “pilot and ponder” culture. Safe, but slow.
We’ve seen promising partnerships this summer OpenAI and UK public services collaborating on pilots (BBC News, Trust: High – mainstream, balanced coverage, July 2025). Yet the debate here so often gets stuck on sovereignty, privacy, or who “owns” the algorithms, rather than driving forward with practical steps to empower our public sector employees…and serve citizens better, now.
Why the gap? The UK has a proud tradition of rigorous oversight, careful procurement, and open debate. But while Parliament reviews and committees consult, the service delivery revolution is happening in real time elsewhere. There isn’t a shortage of talent, ideas, or vendors what’s lacking is the coordination to “test, learn, and scale” rapidly, as the US system is now demonstrating.
Industry is knocking at the door, ready to build, adapt and deploy tools—even as some policymakers still insist on perfecting every rulebook first. But as one US federal official put it, this is about “a first-of-its-kind agreement [that] accelerates AI adoption across federal government with $1 per agency pricing for ChatGPT.” (US General Services Administration, Trust: High – government press release, Aug 2025). The message is: don’t wait—act, measure, refine.
This isn’t about lifting someone else’s playbook. Here’s where the UK could leapfrog, not just catch up, by going “agentic” moving beyond old-school automation to deploy interoperable digital agents and AI-backed oversight rooted in our own values.
The Cabinet Office has quietly piloted frameworks like these, where “Assist” and similar tools are layered into public sector workflows, cutting cycle times by up to 30% and revealing inefficiencies before they turn into headlines (UK Cabinet Office, Trust: High – UK Cabinet Office case studies, June 2025).
Imagine every major infrastructure project and local service from HS2 to city waste contracts having a digital co-pilot that flags suspicious spend or missed milestones, feeding that intel to empowered human decision makers. That’s not science fiction. It’s already in quietly-operating proofs of concept, waiting for leadership to move from “could we?” to “let’s do it.”
This debate goes far beyond fear mongering about job loss or ethical red tape. It’s about redefining productivity in the public sector, centred on empowerment and oversight, not surveillance and sacking. The vision is clear: The real promise of AI and agentic systems lies in freeing up human ingenuity. We want teachers liberated from marking drudgery, health inspectors spending more time on-site and less on paperwork, council teams equipped to focus on outcomes, not just process.
To deliver this, we must:
The US’s “one dollar” ChatGPT revolution challenges us: are we ready to empower our own teams, at every level, with agentic tools and the culture to use them boldly? Or will we keep tinkering and task-forcing, hoping for a safer future that never quite arrives?
My view: policy is important, but now’s the moment for action. With the right mix of homegrown and global tech, plus careful, ethical scaling, the UK can create agentic oversight platforms that protect public value and unlock human potential. The future doesn’t belong to the biggest, but to those willing to lead by doing.
Let’s spend one pound for the future not just on launch events and consultancy, but on real-world tools that make life better for millions. That’s an investment every board or council can justify.
Links:
Quotes: