I’ve spent months working with “Agentic Workers” in production. AI agents that respond to requests, automate routine jobs, and run entire processes at digital speed. The possibilities are exciting, but the wake-up call is even bigger: every new AI-powered task comes with a price tag, not “free” as we’ve come to expect from software.
“As we progress, AI and agentic systems have evolved from experimental technologies to strategic imperatives that fundamentally reshape how organizations operate, compete, and create value.”
Remember the old days of spreadsheets? We’d try out new formulas and run reports just because we could with zero financial consequences. Fast forward: now, every time you tell an AI worker to “fetch this”, “simulate that”, or “post an update”, that’s a real cost hitting your operating budget.
• Old habit: unlimited, instinctive software tinkering no budget barrier.
• New reality: each agentic task is like assigning a team member, and resource discipline matters.
• “Busy work” can sneak in unnoticed. Unlike people, agentic systems never get tired. Without oversight, they’ll burn money on low-value tasks day and night.
“The emergence of agentic AI systems autonomous agents capable of independent decision-making and task execution represents a particularly dynamic segment within this broader market.”
Leaders used to ask, “Do we have the people-hours?” Now, the real question is, “Is the spend justified?” Human project managers are facing a shift: project timelines matter, but budget gates can halt execution cold, regardless of talent or tech.
• Modern agentic project management looks like this:
Every digital “ask” is evaluated for ROI (return on investment).
A budget, not staff capacity, sets the limit on automation and feature rollout.
Value-for-money discipline: if you wouldn’t pay a salary for a repetitive task, why pay for an AI agent to do it?
“Many organizations struggle to accurately estimate total cost of ownership, leading to budget overruns and project delays.”
Here’s the thing: more AI is not automatically better. The winners are those who impose clear fiscal guardrails, cost tracking, and review processes.
• Assign a CFO, CAO (Chief Agentic Officer), or other accountable party to oversee all agentic project work.
• Require business cases for workflows - if you can’t show the value, cut the spend.
• Regularly audit “busy work” that no longer serves a critical goal.
• Wait for budget rather than mindlessly automating everything.
• Ask, “What’s the minimum viable workload for the result we need?”
I’ve felt this tension first-hand. My own roadmap was blocked for a month - not by tech limits, but by budget: “We can do it, but is it worth the spend?” Suddenly, cost disciplines once reserved for hiring people now govern every digital deployment.
• AI and agentic systems need tracks, not open roads.
• Digital experimentation is cheap: until scale means cost balloons.
• Board oversight of agentic budgets isn’t bureaucracy; it’s strategy.
• Project management now pivots on spend, not just speed or skills.
The future belongs to leaders who can channel digital ambition into measured, purposeful, and cost-aware action. Your bottom line depends on it.
Links:
Quotes: